Title

Going for Gold: Implementation and evaluation of a POCUS Olympics faculty development session


Authors

Nadine Vidor, MD;1 Raphael Rabinowitz, MD1

1Clinical Assistant Professor, NYU Grossman School of Medicine


Introduction

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a powerful bedside tool utilized by hospitalists to care for patients, with wide-ranging applications including aiding clinical diagnosis, monitoring response to therapy, and guiding performance of invasive procedures.1-4 Despite its published benefits, POCUS adoption by hospitalists has lagged behind other specialties, in part due to inconsistent training experiences across internal medicine (IM) residencies and a lack of requirements for proficiency to fulfill IM board certification.1,5 As many hospitalists complete IM residency without achieving competency in POCUS, innovative continuing medical education approaches are needed to meet the demands of this growing field.5 With this in mind, we developed, implemented, and evaluated a “POCUS Olympics” faculty development initiative in an attempt to present foundational POCUS learning objectives to a group of novice hospitalist ultrasonographers in a hands-on and enjoyable learning environment.


Methods

Participating hospitalists were divided into teams comprised of NYU internal medicine faculty from one of four NYU-affiliated hospitals. Teams competed across three events: “Cardiac Charades,” “Blind Taboo,” and “Dyspnea Darts,” which combined performance of a POCUS skill on a standardized patient with a game. POCUS-credentialed faculty scored teams across multiple areas, including their abilities to determine the appropriate views to acquire, the quality of the images they obtained, and their solutions to diagnostic questions posed by the clinical scenario presented. Participants were surveyed before and after training to evaluate their exposures to POCUS and impressions of the curriculum, rated on 5-point Likert scales. We performed paired two-tailed T-tests on retrospective pre-post surveys6 to determine participants’ self-ratings of their ability to perform learning objectives aligned to each event.


Results

Fifteen hospitalists participated. 13/15 (86.7%) and 9/15 (60%) completed the pre- and post-participation surveys, respectively. 62% of respondents classified themselves as “beginners,” 77% had previously taken a POCUS course, and 8% reported regularly using POCUS in their clinical practice. Following training, participants rated improvements in their comfort obtaining basic ultrasonographic views (mean rating 2.44 +/- 0.73 to 3.22 +/- 0.67, p = 0.03) and familiarity with utilizing the BLUE protocol7 to evaluate acute dyspnea (1.89 +/- 1.05 to 3.44 +/- 1.13, p = 0.008) on 5-point Likert scales. There was no statistically significant increase in self-ratings of comfort with obtaining quantitative measurements on cardiac POCUS (2.33 +/- 1.13 to 3.33 +/- 0.87 p = 0.07) and describing technical adjustments to optimize ultrasonographic image acquisition (2.44 +/- 1.13 to 3.33 +/- 0.87, p = 0.07). Participants’ mean ratings of the curriculum ranged from 4.22 to 4.67 across the domains of educational merit, promoting teamwork, and entertainment value, with entertainment value rated the highest.


Conclusion

Among a group of beginning learners, POCUS Olympics improved hospitalists’ self-reported abilities to obtain basic views and familiarity with using the BLUE protocol and was overall rated favorably.


References

1Soni NJ, Schnobrich D, Mathews BK, Tierney DM, Jensen TP, Dancel R, Cho J, Dversdal RK, Mints G, Bhagra A, Reierson K, Kurian LM, Liu GY, Candotti C, Boesch B, LoPresti CM, Lenchus J, Wong T, Johnson G, Maw AM, Franco-Sadud R, Lucas BP. Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Hospitalists: A Position Statement of the Society of Hospital Medicine. J Hosp Med. 2019 Jan 2;14:E1-E6. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3079. PMID: 30604779; PMCID: PMC8021128.

2Tierney DM, Rosborough TK, Sipsey LM, Hanson K, Smith CS, Boland LL, Miner R. Association of Internal Medicine Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) with Length of Stay, Hospitalization Costs, and Formal Imaging: a Prospective Cohort Study. POCUS J. 2023 Nov 27;8(2):184-192. doi: 10.24908/pocus.v8i2.16791. PMID: 38099159; PMCID: PMC10721304.

3Bhagra A, Tierney DM, Sekiguchi H, Soni NJ. Point-of-Care Ultrasonography for Primary Care Physicians and General Internists. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016 Dec;91(12):1811-1827. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.08.023. Epub 2016 Nov 5. PMID: 27825617.

4Qaseem A, Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I, Mustafa RA, Kansagara D, Fitterman N, Wilt TJ; Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians; Batur P, Cooney TG, Crandall CJ, Hicks LA, Lin JS, Maroto M, Tice J, Tufte JE, Vijan S, Williams JW Jr. Appropriate Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasonography in Patients With Acute Dyspnea in Emergency Department or Inpatient Settings: A Clinical Guideline From the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2021 Jul;174(7):985-993. doi: 10.7326/M20-7844. Epub 2021 Apr 27. Erratum in: Ann Intern Med. 2022 Mar;175(3):458-459. doi: 10.7326/L22-0020. Erratum in: Ann Intern Med. 2023 Apr;176(4):584. doi: 10.7326/L23-0043. PMID: 33900792.

5LoPresti CM, Schnobrich D, Novak W, Fondahn E, Bardowell R, O'Connor AB, Uthlaut B, Ortiz J, Soni NJ. Current Point of Care Ultrasound Use and Training Among Internal Medicine Residency Programs from the 2020 APDIM Program Director's Survey. Am J Med. 2022 Mar;135(3):397-404. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2021.11.002. Epub 2021 Dec 7. PMID: 34890562.

6Mcleod PJ, Steinert Y, Snell L. Use of retrospective pre/post assessments in faculty development. Medical Education. 2008;42(5):543-543. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03060.

7Lichtenstein DA, Mezière GA. Relevance of lung ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute respiratory failure: the BLUE protocol. Chest. 2008 Jul;134(1):117-25. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-2800. Epub 2008 Apr 10. Erratum in: Chest. 2013 Aug;144(2):721. PMID: 18403664; PMCID: PMC3734893.